Eigen data · Bijgewerkt September 10, 2026

Op welke groeidiensten klikken kopers echt?

Every figure below is a filtered count of click-throughs recorded on our own outbound links, updated daily. It is what readers echt clicked on the pages we publish — which means it is shaped by our own layout as well as by reader interest, because we choose which services a page lists and in what order. Read it as the share of our outbound clicks, not as market demand.

32,130 click-throughs recorded between April 17, 2026 en September 10, 2026·13,262 in de afgelopen 30 dagen.

01 · Per dienst

Waar de kliks van lezers naartoe gaan

Aandeel van alle gevolgde doorkliks, per dienst. Het kleine cijfer is het ruwe aantal kliks; een groene ▲ markeert diensten die in de afgelopen 30 dagen een groter aandeel halen dan zij over de hele periode hebben.

Showing the top 12 van 25 services that clear our publication floor of 100 clicks. Shares are of every counted click, so this table does not add up to 100%: 279 counted clicks sit below the floor and are not shown. The full list of published rows is in the dataset.

Why the top row is the top row: Likes.io is the service we list first on 35 of our 47 ranked buying guides. A service listed first on almost every page collects clicks that a service listed eighth cannot, so its share here measures our placement at least as much as it measures reader preference.

01Likes.io44.1%14,1564.1
02Buzzoid6.6%2,1201.0
03UseViral6.2%1,9990.6
04SidesMedia6.2%1,997
05Media Mister5.3%1,6900.8
06Twicsy3.8%1,219
07Famoid3.8%1,217
08TokTurbo3.7%1,176
09GetViral2.8%897
10Viralyft2.8%896
11Views4You2.1%684
12TweSocial1.6%5280.5

02 · Per platform

Welke platforms kopers laten groeien

Aandeel van de gevolgde doorkliks, uitgesplitst naar het platform waarvoor de koper aan het winkelen was.

Platform is read from the page the click came from, so this table covers only clicks that started on a buying guide for a named platform. 2,775 of the 32,130 counted clicks started somewhere else — a review, a comparison, the home page — or fall below the publication floor. They are excluded from the rows below but still counted in the total each share is divided by.

01Instagram29.7%9,548
02TikTok20.2%6,480
03YouTube12.5%4,004
04SoundCloud7.8%2,518
05Facebook7.4%2,386
06X (Twitter)6.1%1,969
07Spotify3.6%1,162
08Twitch2.7%870
09Kick1.3%418

Hoe u dit leest

Wat dit is: an aggregate, anonymized count of click-throughs recorded on our outbound links, refreshed daily. Exactly two filters apply: known bots, crawlers, and link scanners are excluded by user-agent, and a click only counts if the same session also loaded a page on this site. The second filter matters, because our redirect is a public URL that automation hits without ever reading anything. What does not apply: our internal analytics also drop visits whose browsing pattern looks automated — eight or more pages spread over four or more hours — and this public dataset does not, so these totals are looser than the verified figures we use internally. The counts are of clicks, not people: one reader clicking twice counts twice.

Wat dit niet is: het is een klik, geen aankoop of bevestigde verkoop, en het is niet onze redactionele ranglijst. Populariteit is geen kwaliteit. Welke dienst wij daadwerkelijk aanbevelen, en waarom, wordt bepaald door onze gepubliceerde meetlat en redactionele scoring (plus een betaalde praktijktest van vijf Instagram-diensten), niet door kliks. Zie hoe wij rangschikken.

What we do not capture: impressions, how far down a page a service's card sat, click-through rate, and which page template the click came from. None of those are recorded against an outbound click anywhere in our logs, so no share on this page can be adjusted for how much exposure a service got. That is the single biggest limit of the dataset, and it is why the placement note above is a count of pages rather than a correction to the figures.

De onderliggende cijfers zijn beschikbaar als machineleesbare dataset for anyone who wants to cite or verify them. It carries the same filters, floors and coverage figures as this page.

Corrections and changes

August 26, 2026
Removed the claim that the figures “reflect live demand instead of an opinion”, and the claim that they “track human reader interest as closely as server logs honestly allow”. Neither was supportable: the counts are clicks on links this site places in positions this site chooses, and a stricter automation filter exists in our own analytics code than the one applied here. Added the placement disclosure with its measured page counts, the publication floor, the display cap, the coverage figures that reconcile the tables to the total, the start of the recording window, and an explicit list of the things this dataset does not capture.
July 28, 2026
Tightened the click definition: a click now counts only when the same session also loaded a page on the site. The previous user-agent-only filter counted automation that hit the public /go redirect without ever reading anything, and every figure on this page dropped accordingly.

The figures themselves change every day as new clicks are recorded; this list covers changes to what the report claims, not to the numbers it reports. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.