First-party data · Updated August 17, 2026

What growth services do buyers actually click?

Most “best sites” lists tell you what a publisher wants you to click. This one shows what readers actually did. Every figure below is a real, filtered count of click-throughs recorded on our own outbound links, updated daily, so it reflects live demand instead of an opinion.

21,453 click-throughs recorded to date·11,021 in the last 30 days.

01 · By service

Where reader clicks go

Share of all tracked click-throughs, by service. The small figure is the raw click count; a green ▲ marks services winning a bigger share in the last 30 days than they hold all-time.

01Likes.io41.7%8,9512.4
02Buzzoid7.1%1,5171.0
03UseViral6.4%1,3800.7
04SidesMedia6.3%1,3600.9
05Media Mister4.8%1,0401.2
06Famoid4.2%898
07Twicsy3.9%833
08TokTurbo3.5%7591.5
09Viralyft2.8%601
10GetViral2.8%5930.7
11StormLikes2.3%4962.2
12Views4You2.0%430

02 · By platform

Which platforms buyers grow

Share of tracked click-throughs by the platform the buyer was shopping for.

01Instagram33.2%7,121
02TikTok17.1%3,665
03YouTube10.8%2,318
04SoundCloud9.0%1,924
05Facebook7.2%1,555
06X (Twitter)6.5%1,400
07Spotify3.3%703
08Twitch2.6%561
09Kick1.3%270

How to read this

What this is: a real, aggregate, anonymized count of click-throughs recorded on our outbound links, refreshed daily. Two filters apply: known bots, crawlers, and link scanners are excluded by user-agent, and a click only counts if the same session also loaded a page on this site. The second filter matters, because our redirect is a public URL that automation hits without ever reading anything. So the figures track human reader interest as closely as server logs honestly allow, and they count clicks, not people: one reader clicking twice counts twice.

What this is not: it is a click, not a purchase or a confirmed sale, and it is not our editorial ranking. Popularity is not quality. Which service we actually recommend, and why, is decided by hands-on testing and a published rubric, not by clicks. See how we rank.

The underlying figures are available as a machine-readable dataset for anyone who wants to cite or verify them.