First-party data · Updated July 8, 2026

What growth services do buyers actually click?

Most “best sites” lists tell you what a publisher wants you to click. This one shows what readers actually did. Every figure below is a real, bot-filtered count of reader click-throughs on our own outbound links, updated daily, so it reflects live demand instead of an opinion.

18,643 tracked reader click-throughs to date·10,614 in the last 30 days.

01 · By service

Where reader clicks go

Share of all tracked click-throughs, by service. The small figure is the raw click count; a green ▲ marks services winning a bigger share in the last 30 days than they hold all-time.

01Likes.io27.2%5,0753.6
02SidesMedia11.0%2,0552.0
03UseViral7.8%1,4540.8
04Buzzoid6.2%1,1621.0
05Media Mister6.0%1,124
06Viralyft6.0%1,1111.3
07Famoid5.7%1,0570.5
08GetViral5.4%1,0051.7
09StormLikes4.0%7541.0
10Twicsy3.3%607
11Views4You2.7%512
12Growthoid2.2%414

02 · By platform

Which platforms buyers grow

Share of tracked click-throughs by the platform the buyer was shopping for.

01Instagram31.9%5,939
02YouTube19.2%3,574
03TikTok7.8%1,457
04Facebook6.8%1,264
05X (Twitter)6.2%1,158
06SoundCloud5.2%974
07Spotify3.2%597
08Twitch3.1%572
09Kick1.5%288

How to read this

What this is: a real, aggregate, anonymized count of reader click-throughs on our outbound links, refreshed daily. Known bots, crawlers, and link scanners are excluded by user-agent, so the figures track human reader interest as closely as server logs honestly allow.

What this is not: it is a click, not a purchase or a confirmed sale, and it is not our editorial ranking. Popularity is not quality. Which service we actually recommend, and why, is decided by hands-on testing and a published rubric, not by clicks. See how we rank.

The underlying figures are available as a machine-readable dataset for anyone who wants to cite or verify them.